Today’s news:

Stan takes aim at the FAA, and has a TEA Party

Brooklyn Daily

Here’s a perfect example of government waste and how, as it so often does, it applies to the inefficiencies of both political parties, Mr. Raisman.

On July 22, the first day of the shutdown by the federal government of the Federal Aviation Administration, thousands of employees were prevented from reporting to work. And guess what job many of them had? It was their duty to collect the federal taxes on airline tickets — which total about $30 million a day.

We could argue the merits and demerits of the shut down for years, but the bottom line is that because of it, our government lost a lot of money.

United States Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood blamed this unfortunate situation on a “dysfunctional Congress.”

There are many people in the United States that point fingers at the elected officials on both sides of the aisle in our nation’s capitol. They want a reduction in taxes, limited government spending, less earmarks, a simplification of our tax system, a repeal of the healthcare law passed in March of 2010, and an audit of every federal agency for waste and constitutionality. Who are these people?

They call themselves the TEA party, with the name coming from an event in Boston 238 years ago. The letters standing for Taxed Enough Already. I have attended many TEA party rallies where I have rubbed elbows with Americans from all walks of life. From physicians to plumbers, accountants to actors, carpenters to cops — good, old-fashioned patriotic Americans that do not want to see this nation become a socialist empire akin to those going down the drain in Europe.

Current polls on the popularity of the movement are all over the map. You can point to the one that shows 56 percent of America disagreeing with the party, but I just saw a poll where a mere seven percent think they were the losers in the recent debt situation.

But the only poll that really matters is the one taken on Election Day.

Members of the TEA Party (myself included) have been called racists. That didn’t hold. Then we were Nazis. Sure.

I loved it when guests on Chris Matthews show called us thugs. Hey, Chris. Do you want to talk about thugs? Can you show me where any TEA party rally in the United States did as much damage as the schoolteachers did in Wisconsin? And now, because many of us did not want to see the debt ceiling raised, we are terrorists. Terrorists?

“Heck if we were real domestic terrorists, President Obama would be wanting to pal around with us, wouldn’t he?” This was asked by Sarah Palin in a reference to the President’s association with Bill Ayers.

My favorite comment came from Bernie Goldberg who wrote “the same liberal journalists who won’t call a real terrorist a terrorist can’t go 10 seconds without calling conservative Republicans terrorists.”

OK, my colleagues on the left. If the Republicans that voted against the increase in the debt ceiling are terrorists, what do you call the Democrats that voted the same way?

Blaming the TEA party for the downgrade in the credit rating is like blaming the firemen who are called to extinguish the fire. You lose your credit when you no longer have manageability and spend a lot more than you should. You hear that, Chuck?

• • •

Here’s more for your collection of waste in government. The Feds gave $650,000 of our taxes to North Carolina for “beaver management.” Hey, Mr. Raisman. I was always under the impression that fees for local and state hunting and fishing licenses are collected for that sort of thing. I am StanGershbein@Bellsouth.net promising you more next week.

Reader poll

Is Stan right about the TEA Party?

Yes

No

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

Trainman from Gerritsen Beach says:
As someone who’s voted for President Obama in 2008, I would be the first to say that I have been disappointed in the direction he has taken this country since taking office. His first year in office he channeled his energy and time towards a universal healthcare program instead of working on improving the economy which was his primary theme when running for President.

As for the Tea Party almost everyone that ran as a Tea Party candidate ran on a platform that was in favor of job creation.
The Tea Party’s first year in office was spent trying to dismantle universal healthcare instead of keeping their promise of job creation.
What happened?

The second year The Tea Party is in office they are spending all their time on the national debt and what has to be done about it.

The Tea Party says they are against raising taxes. Perhaps they could explain what happens when the federal government reduces funding to state and city projects and then the state passes the expense on to the working class taxpayers. Isn’t that raising taxes?
Where are the jobs the tea party promised?
Why has the Tea Party been conspicuously silent about jobs and lowering unemployment statistics to 1990s levels?
Aug. 15, 2011, 1:17 pm
Stan Gershbein says:
Dear Mr. Trainman,
I don't know where you are finding your facts. Where are you getting this 'first year' and 'second year' from?The Tea Party took over the House of Representatives this past January....seven months ago. We now control only one-third of the government. The Tea Party candidates ran on a platform of reducing spending, size of government and taxes. These miracles can only be accomplished after the next presidential election when, with the help og God, we will take over the Senate and the White House.
Thank you for writing.
Aug. 17, 2011, 9:22 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynDaily.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynDaily.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

CNG: Community Newspaper Group