|Print this story||Permalink|
In the recent Barbra Streisand flick “Guilt Trip,” there’s a scene where Barbra, playing Joyce Brewster, refills her empty water bottles with sink water.
Very few of us admit to doing that, but I am sure there are more than just a few who do. We must find out the answer to the question “Is there enough of a difference between the bottled water we shlep from Waldbaum’s and the relatively inexpensive H20 that my college professor referred to as Aqua Tapparratta way back in 1958?” To help us find out our hostess had about 20 of us perform an experiment with her.
When everyone arrived, she pulled 14 cold bottles of water from her refrigerator. The brand labels were removed. Only the numerals one to seven were marked on the bottles. She then told us that there were two Poland Spring, two Dasani, two Great Value, two Sam’s Purified, two Nestle’s, two Nice Brand, and two bottles of plain sink water. There were also two sleeves of small paper cups on the counter.
Our job was to taste a bit of each and write down the numbers of which, in our opinion, tasted the best, the worst, and which we thought was the sink water. There was no real consensus of which tasted best and which tasted worst. The votes were scattered all over the place, and that included the sink water.
In fact, several of the guests chose the sink water as the best.
So much for making the investment in bottled water.
• • •
And another blown call by a Major League umpire affected the outcome of a game. We’ve had more than our fair share this season. Enough already.
When will baseball finally accept the technology of the instant replay? The argument by the umpires, who are dead set against replays, is that they will slow down an already slow game. That’s a crock.
The average argument between the managers and the umpires lasts between a10 and 15 minutes. We see the ump’s errors from several angles in less than two minutes. If anything, the use of the instant replay will do away with the arguments, and speed up the game.
• • •
The people that run the “Miss World” contest goofed big time by holding this year’s competition on the resort island of Bali and in Sentul. Sentul is an area near Jakarta the capital of Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation. The London-based Miss World Organization has succumbed to religious demands that the 139 women not wear bikinis. Tsk tsk.
Up until now a great portion of the pageant has been a body show, with most men legally ogling some of the most beautiful and talented females in the world. There is nothing wrong with looking at beautiful gals. Beach weather has arrived and the next time you’re on the sand at Brighton or Coney take a good look at the eyes of all the men around you. Looking and not touching is truly one of the masculine pleasures of life.
As old as I get, I still see no problem with window shopping. The Miss World Contest is a big, big money maker. I am StanGershbein@Bellsouth.net wondering, how many fewer viewers will watch this year?Read Stan Gershbein's column every Monday on BrooklynDaily.com.
©2013 Community Newspaper Group
|Print this story||Permalink|
By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:
You agree that you, and not BrooklynDaily.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynDaily.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.